Article Text

Download PDFPDF

2022-RA-725-ESGO Treatment patterns & outcomes of patients with locally advanced vulvar or vaginal cancer in British Columbia
  1. Emily Leung1,
  2. Cassia Tremblay1,
  3. Donna Liao2,
  4. Longlong Huang3,
  5. Shaun Zheng Sun3 and
  6. Jenny Ko4
  1. 1Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  2. 2Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
  3. 3Mathematics and Statistics, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, BC, Canada
  4. 4Medical Oncology, Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Centre, Abbotsford, BC, Canada


Introduction/Background As vulvar and vaginal cancers are rare malignancies, treatment is extrapolated from the cervical cancer field, in which concurrent chemoradiation is used. Thus, further studies are necessary to evaluate whether surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or combined chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) will benefit patients the most.

Methodology A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients diagnosed with vulvar or vaginal cancer in 2000–2017. Descriptive statistics were used to compare survival outcomes between surgery, RT only, and CCRT.

Results We included 688 patients with either vulvar (N=560, 81%) or vaginal cancer (N=128, 19%). Median age of diagnosis was 68 (range 27–98) years. In multivariate survival analysis, vulvar cancer was associated with more likelihood of death compared to vaginal cancer (Hazard ratio (HR): 1.50, p=0.042). For patients who received curative RT, median OS (mOS) was 63.8 months with concurrent chemotherapy vs 46.3 months without (p=0.75) for vulvar cancer; for vaginal cancer, mOS was 100.4 months with concurrent chemotherapy vs 66.6 months without (p=0.31). For those who received RT (N=224, 40%; HR: 0.80, p=0.25), adding chemotherapy was not associated with statistically significant improvement in OS for vulvar (N=101, 18%; HR: 0.80, p=0.30) or vaginal (N=51, 40%; HR: 1.31, p=0.41) cancers. Vulvar cancer patients who received ≥5 weeks of chemotherapy had better OS (HR: 0.78, p=0.038) vs <5 weeks of treatment. This effect on OS was not seen in vaginal cancer patients (HR: 0.95, p=0.86). In the 221 (32%) patients who had disease relapse, the most common patterns of relapse were the pelvis without RT (N=96, 43%) and the primary site where radiation was given (N=89, 40%).

Conclusion In this retrospective study, CCRT was not associated with significant improvements in survival for patients with vulvar or vaginal cancer compared to RT only. Future studies investigating novel therapies to treat these cancers are needed to improve patient outcomes.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.