Introduction/Background The treatment of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer has changed significantly over recent years, with innovations in poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors playing a major role in shifting clinical approaches. This activity was designed to understand the current level of knowledge and assess competence/confidence of physicians regarding the use of PARP inhibitors as maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer.

Methodology A 27-question, online, continuing medical education (CME) self-assessment was developed that included a range of demographic, knowledge, confidence and practice-based multiple-choice questions on PARP inhibitors for maintenance therapy in ovarian cancer. The activity was launched for oncologists practicing outside of the US on September 16, 2021 and data was collected to December 3, 2021.

Results At the time of analysis, 37 oncologists and 79 gynecologists completed the activity: 95% of oncologists and 81% of gynecologists were unable to determine the appropriate tests for high-grade serious ovarian cancer. Knowledge was varied amongst oncologists and gynecologists in regards to the appropriate maintenance strategy for differing clinical scenarios (incorrect answers between 38–78% for the two specialties). Between 27–78% answered various questions incorrectly regarding clinical data with PARP inhibitors for maintenance therapy. Oncologists and gynecologists showed a lack of competence (incorrect answers between 47–62%) on the appropriate approach to managing adverse events while on therapy. 27% of oncologists and 41% of gynecologists were not/slightly confident in their ability to select an appropriate PARP inhibitor maintenance regime. 20% of oncologists and 40% of gynecologists were not/slightly confident in their ability to manage AEs in patients receiving PARP inhibitors.

Conclusion The findings reveal important knowledge, competence and confidence gaps amongst physicians who manage ovarian cancer. These focus on selection of an appropriate maintenance regimen, the latest clinical trial data and managing AEs while on treatment. Addressing these gaps is critical to improve the management of patients.