Article Text

Download PDFPDF

2022-RA-1074-ESGO AGO-OVAR 2.29 (ENGOT-ov34): atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy vs bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer
Free
  1. Philipp Harter1,
  2. Frederik Marmé2,
  3. Klaus Pietzner3,
  4. Alexander Reuss4,
  5. Isabelle Ray-Coquard5,
  6. Andrés Redondo6,
  7. Ana Oaknin7,
  8. Goda Jonuskiene8,
  9. Kristina Lindemann9,
  10. Christian Kurzeder10,
  11. Jens Huober11,
  12. Els van Nieuwenhuysen12,
  13. Stephanie Henry13,
  14. Christian Marth14,
  15. Irina Tsibulak14,
  16. Nadin Cron15 and
  17. Patricia Pautier16
  1. 1AGO Study Group and Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Ev. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, 45138 Essen, Germany
  2. 2AGO Study Group and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
  3. 3Department of Gynecology, AGO Study Group and Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  4. 4AGO Study Group and Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Marburg, Germany
  5. 5GINECO and Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
  6. 6GEICO and Hospital Universitario La Paz – IdiPAZ, La Paz, Spain
  7. 7GEICO and Vall d’Hebron Instituto de Oncología (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
  8. 8NSGO-CTU, Denmark and Vilnius Universiteto Ligoninė Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
  9. 9NSGO-CTU, Denmark and Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  10. 10SAKK and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, Basel, Switzerland
  11. 11SAKK and Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Brustzentrum, Klinik für Med. Onkologie und Hämatologie, St. Gallen, Switzerland
  12. 12BGOG and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  13. 13BGOG and Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur Site Ste Elisabeth, Service d’onco-hématologie (SORMN), Namur, Belgium
  14. 14AGO-Austria and Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Innsbruck, Austria
  15. 15AGO Study Group, Essen, Germany
  16. 16GINECO and Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France

Abstract

Introduction/Background Paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in combination with bevacizumab constitutes a standard treatment option in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer (ROC) who are not considered candidate for platinum, but responses are short-lived. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors like atezolizumab as single agents have limited activity in ovarian cancer. There is a biologic rationale to combine checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy and bevacizumab, however, the role of such combination for the management of ovarian cancer is so far undefined. Because of the intimate relationship between angiogenesis and immunosuppression, it is expected that inhibition of both pathways could lead to synergism and more durable clinical benefit. The addition of a chemotherapeutic agent is expected to lead to the release of tumor antigens and enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy. Therefore, we aim to test the efficacy of atezolizumab in combination with non-platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab vs the combination of a non-platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab alone.

Methodology AGO-OVAR 2.29 is a randomized (1:1), double-blinded, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel or PLD) compared with placebo, bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with 1st or 2nd relapse within 6 months after completing platinum-based chemotherapy or 3rd relapse. Patients are treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A de novo tumor biopsy to determine the PD-L1 expression status prior to randomization for stratification is mandatory. Co-primary endpoints are overall survival and progression-free-survival. Target recruitment is 550 patients. Safety interim analyses were performed after inclusion of 24, 60 and 120 patients who had completed at least one cycle.

Results Screening was stopped on 23-May-2022. As of 30-May-2022, 554 patients have been randomized.

Conclusion This concept might open the possibility to investigate the synergetic effect of immune-checkpoint and angiogenesis inhibitors in ROC.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.