Article Text

Download PDFPDF

2022-RA-999-ESGO Clinical relevance of clinicopathological and molecular factors in women with surgically treated stage IV endometrial cancer
Free
  1. Linda Nooij1,
  2. Margot Uijterwaal2,
  3. Christianne Lok3,
  4. Cor de Kroon1,
  5. Jenneke Kasius2,
  6. Ronald Zweemer4,
  7. Cees Geerestein4,
  8. N Horeweg5,
  9. Tjalling Bosse6 and
  10. Jacolien van der Marel4
  1. 1Gynaecology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands
  2. 2Gynaecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  3. 3Gynaecology, AvL, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  4. 4Gynaecology, UMCU, Utrecht, Netherlands
  5. 5Radiation Oncology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands
  6. 6Pathology, LUMC, Leiden, Netherlands

Abstract

Introduction/Background Risk stratification, treatment and prognosis of stage I-III endometrial cancer (EC) are dependent on its molecular subclassification. The role of this classification has not been investigated for stage IV EC. Studies on optimal treatment for stage IV EC are scarce and management is authority based and individualized. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with chemotherapy has been associated with superior overall survival (OS). This study aimes to investigate whether the molecular EC subclassification can be used as a predictive marker for successful CRS.

Methodology A retrospective cohort study was performed from 01–01–2000 until 31–12–2018 including 157 surgically-treated stage IV EC patients from five hospitals in The Netherlands. Tumour samples were molecularly classified according to the WHO 2020 classification and estrogen receptor (ER) expression status was evaluated. Molecular risk factors for intra-abdominal residual disease were identified by multivariable logistic regression analysis. OS after CRS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier’s method, groups were compared using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors for OS were determined by multivariable Cox regression analyses.

Results Molecular classification shows a dissimilar distribution compared to stage I-III EC; i.e. POLE mutation (POLEmut) 3.2%, mismatch-repair deficient (MMRd) 13.4%, no specific molecular profile (NSMP) 24.8%, p53 abnormal (p53abn) 58.6% (table 1). A trend for incomplete CRS was observed for p53-abn and NSMP EC (OR 3.25, p=0.094 and OR 4.12, p=0.057 respectively), compared to MMRd EC. Complete CRS, histotype, grade and ER status had a significant impact on OS (figure 1A-C). Molecular classification not (figure 1D). Optimal (HR2.99, p<0.0001) and incomplete CRS (HR2.73, p<0.0001), grade 3 endometrioid (HR3.00, p=0.001) and non-endometrioid histotypes (HR2.50, p=0.006) were independent risk factors for shorter OS.

Abstract 2022-RA-999-ESGO Figure 1
Abstract 2022-RA-999-ESGO Table 1

Patient characteristics by molecular class

Conclusion Molecular classification of stage IV EC patients revealed a different distribution compared to earlier stages EC. Novel and intriguing is that molecular classification does not seem to influence surgical outcome and prognosis.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.