Article Text

Download PDFPDF

212 Multiplex qPCR hotspot testing of pathogenic POLE mutations: a rapid, simple and reliable approach for POLE assessment in endometrial cancer
  1. AS Van den Heerik1,
  2. N Ter Haar2,
  3. N Horeweg1,
  4. T Van Wezel2,
  5. C Creutzberg1,
  6. V Smit2 and
  7. T Bosse2
  1. 1Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Radiation Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands
  2. 2Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Pathology, Leiden, Netherlands


Introduction/Background*Detection of pathogenic somatic variants in the exonuclease domain (EDM) of the POLE-gene is of prognostic importance because of the excellent clinical outcomes of POLE-mutated endometrial cancers (EC). It is hypothesised that patients with POLE-mutated EC benefit of treatment de-escalation. Since 8–10% of EC carry a pathogenic POLE-mutation, it is of strong clinical importance to accurately determine the presence of these mutations. In current practice POLE-status can only be determined by DNA-sequencing methods, e.g. Sanger or Next-Generation-Sequencing (NGS). These techniques require a molecular biologist for correct interpretation, are relatively time consuming, not widely available and/or expensive. Due to the long turnaround time, it can be challenging to fit POLE-testing in tight timelines of clinical practice. To overcome this we have developed, and are in the process of validating, a rapid, simple, reliable and low-cost quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (qPCR) assay for pathogenic POLE-mutations.

Methodology Primer and fluorescence-labelled 5’-nuclease probe-sequences of the five most frequently occurring pathogenic variations within exons 9, 13 and 14 of the POLE EDM have been developed and optimized using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissues. The simplicity of the design enables POLE-status assessment within 4 hours. Ongoing calibration studies are evaluating the minimal amount and quality of DNA required.

Result(s)*Cut offs for failed, POLE-negative and -positive results were predefined based on 50 POLE-wildtypes and 6 POLE-mutated cases. In the range of uncertainty in between, NGS-testing is recommended. In our first testing set of 115 cases (40 POLE-mutated, 75 POLE-wildtype), two samples failed, (one POLE-mutant, one wildtype) possibly due to low DNA quality. Four samples fell in the range of uncertainty (three POLE-mutant, one wildtype). Almost all POLE-mutants (33/36) were positive with no false-positives. Sensitivity and specificity were 92% (95%CI 83%–100%) and 100%. Post-hoc adjusment of the lower cut-off yielded a sensitivity of 97% (95%CI 92%–100%) and specifity of 100%.

Conclusion*With this qPCR assay we developed a faster and simple alternative for targeted NGS-sequencing of the five most common pathogenic POLE-mutations. The assay–s simplicity in design and methods will make universal low-cost POLE-testing available for all EC patients.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.