Article Text

Download PDFPDF

444 Efficacy analysis of niraparib using patient-derived xenograft of rare subtypes of ovarian cancer
  1. H Asano1,
  2. KC Hatanaka2,3,
  3. Y Matsuno4,
  4. Y Hatanaka2,3 and
  5. H Watari1
  1. 1Hokkaido University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sapporo, Japan
  2. 2Hokkaido University Hospital, Center for Development of Advanced Diagnostics, Sapporo, Japan
  3. 3Hokkaido University Hospital, Research Division of Genome Companion Diagnostics, Sapporo, Japan
  4. 4Hokkaido University Hospital, Department of Surgical Pathology, Sapporo, Japan


Introduction/Background*Niraparib, a PARP inhibitor, causes synthetic lethality in tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and is now approved for ovarian cancer. However, the genetic alterations related to HRD rarely occur in ovarian cancers other than high-grade serous carcinoma or endometrioid carcinoma, thus the efficacy of niraparib for rare subtypes of ovarian cancer remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of niraparib using Patient-Derived-Xenograft (PDX) models with rare subtypes of ovarian cancer and correlated between the efficacy and the expression levels of SLFN11 and ARID1A, a sensitizer of DNA-targeted therapies and a key component of the SWI/SNF complex, respectively.

Methodology We consecutively collected a total of 11 tissue specimens with a preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer which was surgically resected in our hospital. These tumors were directly transplanted subcutaneously into NOG mice and PDXs were established. The histologic characteristics were compared between parental tumors and PDX ones. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for ARID1A (D2A8U, Cell Signaling Technology) and SLFN11(D-2 sc-515071X, Santa Cruz) and genetic alterations of 160 cancer-related genes including ARID1A (Human Comprehensive Cancer Panel, Qiagen) were performed using the parental tumors. Response to carboplatin (CBDCA) and niraparib was analyzed using the PDX models.

Result(s)*PDXs were established for each one case of carcinosarcoma (CS), adenocarcinoma (Adeno) with neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), and clear cell carcinoma (CCC). In histological comparison, PDX tumors generally mimicked the parental tumors. Loss of ARID1A in IHC was found in CCC and CS cases, and genetic alteration of ARID1A was also detected in the CCC case. Positive staining for SLFN11 was found in CS and Adeno with NEC, both of which had TP53 alterations. In the PDX of CS, both CBDCA and niraparib suppressed tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner. In the PDX of Adeno with NEC, CBDCA significantly suppressed tumor growth, while niraparib did not. The efficacy of CBDCA and niraparib is currently under consideration in the PDX of CCC.

Conclusion*The combination of ARID1A and SLFN11 in IHC may be an efficacy biomarker for niraparib in rare subtypes of ovarian cancer. We plan to increase the sample size in the future.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.