Article Text

Download PDFPDF

674 Niraparib as maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a GEICO study within the Spanish extended access program
  1. JF Cueva Bañuelos1,
  2. I Palacio2,
  3. C Churruca3,
  4. A Herrero-Ibáñez4,
  5. B Pardo5,
  6. M Constenla6,
  7. A Santaballa7,
  8. L Manso8,
  9. P Estévez9,
  10. C Maximiano10,
  11. M Legerén11,
  12. G Marquina12,
  13. A De Juan13,
  14. M Quindós14,
  15. L Sánchez15,
  16. A Barquin16,
  17. I Fernández Pérez17,
  18. C Martín-Lorente18,
  19. A Juárez19 and
  20. A González-Martín15
  1. 1Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Medical Oncology, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  2. 2Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Medical Oncology, Oviedo, Spain
  3. 3Hospital Universitario Donostia, Medical Oncology, San Sebastián, Spain
  4. 4Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Medical Oncology, Zaragoza, Spain
  5. 5Institut Català d’ Oncologia (ICO) Duran i Reynals – IDIBELL, Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
  6. 6Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Medical Oncology, Pontevedra, Spain
  7. 7Hospital Universitari i Politècnic la Fe, Medical Oncology, Valencia, Spain
  8. 8Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
  9. 9Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Medical Oncology, Seville, Spain
  10. 10Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
  11. 11Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Medical Oncology, Granada, Spain
  12. 12Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
  13. 13Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Medical Oncology, Santander, Spain
  14. 14Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, Medical Oncology, A Coruña, Spain
  15. 15Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
  16. 16Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
  17. 17Hospital Universitario Álvaro Cunqueiro, Medical Oncology, Vigo, Spain
  18. 18Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Medical Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
  19. 19Hospital Universitari Sant Joan d’Alacant, Medical Oncology, Alicante, Spain


Introduction/Background*In the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial, niraparib demonstrated a significantly longer PFS in patients (pts) with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) vs placebo as maintenance therapy, regardless of gBRCA/HRD status. Niraparib obtained EU approval in 2017 and an expanded access program (EAP) was initiated.

Methodology A retrospective study of niraparib maintenance therapy was conducted within the Spanish EAP, at 57 hospitals. Niraparib’s safety, dose adjustments, and effectiveness in real-world setting were assessed. Patient characteristics and starting dose individualizations were also analyzed. EAP’s inclusion required at least 2 previous courses of platinum-containing therapy. For the last course prior to inclusion a response should have been obtained. Although BRCAmut and BRCAwt pts could be included, most were BRCAwt because olaparib was commercialized at that time for pts with BRCAmut and pts were allowed to be included only in specific circumstances.

Result(s)*Between September 2020 and March 2021, 316 pts were included. Median age was 63 years (31-88). More common initial FIGO stages were IIIC, IVB, and IVA (50.0%, 13.6%, 11.1%). 5.7% were BRCAmut, 80.4% BRCAwt, and 13.9% unknown. 93.4% had initial surgery and 22.8% after relapse. Previous bevacizumab was given in 40.8% of pts. Before niraparib, pts had ECOG 0-1 (50.3%-47.5%) and 55.7% had measurable disease. Population weights (Kg) were 43-57 (23.1%), 58-76 (52.2%), and 77-105 (17.7%). 19.7% had baseline platelets <150,000/µL, with a median of 203,500/µL. Individualized starting dose (ISD) was applied in 203 pts (64.2%); 142 (70%) of them started at 200 mg. Niraparib’s mean dose was 201.5 mg (59.2% had ≥1 reduction and 63.3% ≥1 interruption). 6.0% discontinued due to niraparib-related adverse events. Main G3-4 hematological toxicities were thrombocytopenia (17.4% ISD-32.0% fixed starting dose (FSD)), anemia (12.4% ISD-17.5% FSD), and neutropenia (7.5% ISD-5.8% FSD). There were not relevant G3-4 non-hematological events. 58 (18.3%) pts were long-term responders (treatment ≥1 year). 47 (14.9%) remained on treatment upon analysis.

Conclusion*The use of niraparib as maintenance therapy in pts with recurrent PSOC in real-life setting is safe. The ISD approach improved the safety profile. Results were in accordance with those reported in phase III trials. Overall effectiveness analysis is coming.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.