Article Text

Download PDFPDF

267 Outcome quality standards in advanced ovarian cancer surgery
  1. A Serra1,2,
  2. MT Climent1,2 and
  3. A Llueca1
  1. 1Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castelló de la Plana, Spain
  2. 2Jaume I University, Castelló de la Plana, Spain


Introduction/Background*Advanced ovarian cancer surgery (AOCS) frequently results in serious postoperative complications. Because managing AOCS is difficult, some standards need to be established that allow surgeons to assess the quality of treatment provided and consider what aspects should improve. This study aimed to identify quality indicators (QIs) of clinical relevance and to establish their acceptable quality limits (i.e., standard) in AOCS.

Methodology We performed a systematic search on clinical practice guidelines, consensus conferences, and reviews on the outcome and quality of AOCS to identify which QIs have clinical relevance in AOCS. We then searched the literature (from January 2006 to December 2018) for each QI in combination with the keywords of advanced ovarian cancer, surgery, outcome, and oncology. Standards for each QI were determined by statistical process control techniques. The acceptable quality limits for each QI were defined as being within the limits of the 99.8% interval, which indicated a favorable outcome.

Result(s)*A total of 38 studies were included. The QIs selected for AOCS were complete removal of the tumor upon visual inspection (complete cytoreductive surgery), a residual tumor of < 1 cm (optimal cytoreductive surgery), a residual tumor of > 1 cm (suboptimal cytoreductive surgery), major morbidity, and 5-year survival. The rates of complete cytoreductive surgery, optimal cytoreductive surgery, suboptimal cytoreductive surgery, morbidity, and 5- year survival had quality limits of < 27%, < 23%, > 39%, > 33%, and < 27%, respectively.

Abstract 267 Figure 1

Complete cytoreductive surgery (CCS) rate (P-chart). Each dot represents an included study. The gray area (standard zone) is within the 95% confidence interval, the blue are (alert zone) is betweeen the 95% and 99.98% confidence intervals, and the white area (alarm zone) is outside the 99.8% limit

Conclusion*Our results provide a general view of clinical indicators for AOCS. Acceptable quality limits that can be considered as standards were established.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.