Article Text
Abstract
Introduction/Background*Recent findings have suggested that lymphadenectomy during primary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with ovarian cancer was not associated with an improve in survival, at the expense of a high morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of lymphadenectomy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer benefitting from neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS).
Methodology A retrospective, unicentric study including all patients undergoing NACT and IDS was carried out from 2005-2018. Patients with and without lymphadenectomy were compared in terms of recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and complication rates. Survival was assessed using a Cox regression model and Kaplan Meyer curves.
Result(s)*We included 203 patients. Of these, 133 had a lymphadenectomy (65.5%) and 77 had involved nodes (57.9%). Patients who did not benefit from a lymphadenectomy were older with a more extensive disease and lesser rate of complete CRS. No differences were noted between the lymphadenectomy and no lymphadenectomy group concerning 2-year RFS (47.4% and 48.6%, p=0.87, respectively) and 5-year OS (63.2% versus 58.6%, p=0.41, respectively). Post-operative complications tended to be more frequent in the group with a lymphadenectomy (18.57 versus 31.58, p=0.09). In the group of patients with lymphadenectomy, survival was significantly altered in patients with involved nodes (positive lymph nodes: 2-year RFS 42.5% and 5-year OS 49.4%, negative nodes: 2-year RFS 60.7% and 5-year OS 82.2%, p= 0.03 and p<0.001 , respectively).
Conclusion*Lymphadenectomy during IDS does not improve survival and increases post-operative complications.