Article Text

Download PDFPDF

984 Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on training and mental wellbeing of surgical gynaecological oncology trainees
  1. F Gaba1;2,
  2. O Blyuss3;4,
  3. I Rodriguez5,
  4. J Dilley6,
  5. YL Wan7,
  6. A Saiz8,
  7. Z Razumova9,
  8. K Zalewski10,
  9. T Nikolova11,
  10. I Selcuk12,
  11. N Bizzarri13,
  12. C Theofanakis14,
  13. M Lanner15,
  14. A Pletnev16,
  15. M Gurumurthy1 and
  16. R Manchanda6;17
  1. 1Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, UK
  2. 2University of Aberdeen, UK
  3. 3University of Hertfordshire, UK
  4. 4Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Russian Federation
  5. 5University of Washington, USA
  6. 6Barts Health NHS Trust, UK
  7. 7The University of Manchester, UK
  8. 8Northwestern University in Chicago, USA
  9. 9Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
  10. 10Świętokrzyskie Cancer Centre, Poland
  11. 11Academic Teaching Hospital of Heidelberg University, Germany
  12. 12Ankara City Hospital, Turkey
  13. 13Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Italy
  14. 14General Hospital of Athens Alexandra, Greece
  15. 15Kardinal Schwarzenberg Klinikum, Austria
  16. 16Samodzielny Publiczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej w Sulechowe, Poland
  17. 17Queen Mary University of London, UK


Introduction/Background*The SARS-CoV-2 global-pandemic has caused a crisis disrupting health systems worldwide. Whilst efforts are afoot to determine the extent of disruption, impact on gynaecological oncology trainees/training has not been explored. We present data from an international survey on impact of SARS-CoV-2 on clinical practice, medical education, and mental wellbeing of surgical gynaecological oncology trainees.

Methodology In our prospective cohort study, a customised web-based-survey was circulated to surgical gynaecological oncology trainees from national/international organisations (May-November 2020). Validated questionnaires assessed mental wellbeing. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher’s exact test tested hypothesis about differences in means and proportions. Multiple linear regression evaluated effect of variables on psychological/mental wellbeing outcomes. Outcomes included clinical practice, medical education, anxiety & depression, distress, mental wellbeing

Result(s)*127 trainees from 34 countries responded. 52% (66/127) were from countries with national training programmes (UK/USA/Netherlands/Canada/Australia) and 48% (61/127) from non-national training programme countries. 28% had suspected/confirmed COVID19; 28% experienced drop in household income; 20% self-isolated from households; 45% had to re-use personal protective equipment and 22% purchased their own. 32.3% (41/127) trainees (national training programme trainees=16.6% (11/66); non national training programme trainees=49.1% (30/61), p=0.02) require additional time to complete their training fellowship. The additional training time anticipated did not differ between trainees from countries with/without national training programmes (p=0.11). Surgical training was detrimentally impacted for 50% trainees, with more national training programme trainees (62.3% (38/61) than non national training programme trainees (38.5% (25/65), p=0.01) reporting a detrimental impact despite a greater reduction in mean surgical exposure reported by non national training programme trainees. Departmental teaching continued throughout the pandemic for 69% (87/126) trainees, albeit at reduced frequency for 16.1% (14/87), and virtually for 88.5% (77/87). Trainees reporting adequate pastoral support had better mental wellbeing with lower-levels of anxiety/depression (p=0.02) and distress (p<0.001). National training programme trainees experienced higher levels of distress (p=0.01). Mean mental wellbeing scores were significantly higher pre-pandemic (8.3 (SD=1.6) versus post-pandemic (7 (SD=1.8);p=<0.01).

Conclusion*SARS-CoV-2 has negatively impacted surgical training, household income and psychological/mental wellbeing of surgical gynaecological oncology trainees. Overall clinical impact was worse for non national training programme versus national training programme-trainees, though national-training-programme-trainees reported greater distress. COVID19-sickness increased anxiety/depression. The recovery-phase must focus on improving mental-wellbeing and addressing lost training opportunities.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.