Article info
Original research
Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Correspondence to Dr Dimitrios Nasioudis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104, Pennsylvania, USA; dimitrios.nasioudis{at}uphs.upenn.edu
Citation
Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size <2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Publication history
- Received February 7, 2021
- Revision received April 26, 2021
- Accepted April 28, 2021
- First published May 20, 2021.
Online issue publication
July 05, 2021
Article Versions
- Previous version (20 May 2021).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Supplementary Data
This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.