You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 31, Issue 6
  • TRAINING-Ovary 01 (connecTed pRehabiliAtIoN pelvIc caNcer surGery): multicenter randomized study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients managed for ovarian cancer with or without a connected pre-habilitation program

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Clinical trial
TRAINING-Ovary 01 (connecTed pRehabiliAtIoN pelvIc caNcer surGery): multicenter randomized study comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients managed for ovarian cancer with or without a connected pre-habilitation program
  1. Eric Lambaudie1,2,
  2. Cécile Bannier/Braticevic3,
  3. Charlène Villaron/Goetgheluck4,
  4. Christophe Zemmour5,
  5. Jean-Marie Boher5,
  6. Patrick Ben Soussan6,
  7. Jihane Pakradouni7,
  8. Clement Brun8,
  9. Leonor Lopez Almeida7 and
  10. Patricia Marino2,9
  1. 1 Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
  2. 2 Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Marseille, France
  3. 3 Department of Oncology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
  4. 4 Management Sport and Cancer Laboratory EA4670, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
  5. 5 Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Statistics and Methodology Unit, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
  6. 6 Department of Clinical Psychology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
  7. 7 Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
  8. 8 Department of Anesthesiology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
  9. 9 SESSTIM U1252, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
  1. Correspondence to Professor Eric Lambaudie, Department of Surgery, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France; lambaudiee{at}ipc.unicancer.fr

Abstract

Background Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery for advanced ovarian cancer may have impaired functional capacity, nutritional status, and emotional well-being.

Primary objective(s) TRAINING-01 aims to determine if a connected pre-habilitation program during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients treated for an advanced ovarian cancer will improve physical capacity before major abdomino-pelvic surgery.

Study hypothesis A pre-habilitation program during neoadjuvant chemotherapy will bring a fitter patient to surgery and will decrease treatment morbidity and improve oncological outcomes.

Trial design This study is a prospective, multi-center, phase III study. The pre-habilitation program consists of providing multi-dimensional support during neoadjuvant chemotherapy using connected devices. The control group will receive usual care.

Major inclusion/exclusion criteria Eligible patients will be women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III–IV advanced ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients must be able to perform a cardiopulmonary exercise test.

Primary endpoint(s) The primary endpoint will be the comparison of the variation in maximum oxygen uptake (VO2 max) between baseline and surgery in the pre-habilitation group and control groups.

Sample size 136 patients (68 per arm) will be recruited to demonstrate a medium standardized effect d=0.5 in the variations of VO2 max between baseline and surgery.

Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting results The duration of the study includes 24 months of recruitment and 5 years of follow up. We anticipate reporting primary endpoint results in 2024.

Trial registration TRAINING-01-IPC 2018-039 (NCT04451369).

  • ovarian cancer

Data availability statement

Data are available upon request.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2020-002128

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon request.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors Study concept and design: all authors. Acquisition of data: JP, LLA, PM. Analysis and interpretation of data: CZ, JMB. Drafting/final editing: EL, PM. Critical revision: all authors. Tables and figures: EL, CBB, LLA.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.