Statistics from Altmetric.com
- cervical cancer
- neoplasm micrometastasis
- retroperitoneal space
- gynecologic surgical procedures
The increase in maternal age over the last few decades has led to a higher incidence of cervical cancer diagnoses during pregnancy. Among cancers diagnosed during pregnancy, the frequency of cervical cancer is second only to that of breast cancer.1 Cervical cancer can be treated with fertility preservation and pregnancy maintenance, depending on tumor size, stromal invasion, histological characteristics, and lymph node status.
Lymph node dissection can be performed either by the transperitoneal route or the extraperitoneal approach. For locally advanced cervical cancer, this was first reported in 1996, when the outcome of transperitoneal dissection in porcine models was shown to be inferior to that of extraperitoneal laparoscopy due to adhesion formation.2
In pregnancy, laparoscopic lymphadenectomy with simple trachelectomy and cerclage was first reported in 2010, and in 2015 was shown to be a viable treatment option. However, none of these procedures were performed extraperitoneally.3
The extraperitoneal route is a promising but underused option, owing to the dearth of published reports. For this reason, although the technique was classically employed for para-aortic access, notably during pregnancy, when uterine size could hinder access to iliac or para-aortic spaces, this route has potential usefulness because it prevents injury, and also decreases fetal exposure to general anesthesia.4
Given the need for surgical staging and the difficulties of laparotomy or transperitoneal laparoscopy in twin pregnancies, we opted to perform an extraperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy with bilateral access.
The patient was a 39-year-old woman carrying a monochorionic diamniotic pregnancy at 16 weeks. She was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma because of abnormal first-semester bleeding at 8 weeks. The initial clinical staging was FIGO (2018) IB2, after confirmation by MRI.
At 16 weeks, we performed an extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy with bilateral access, in the absence of mapped sentinel lymph nodes. Then, we performed an amplified conization and cervical cerclage.
Data availability statement
All data relevant to the study are included in the article.
Collaborators Guilherme Bicudo Barbosa.
Contributors MC, VA-B, RR, AWL, SP and RM-M actively participated in the case design. All authors participated in drafting the work, revising critically, and approving the final version. The surgery was performed by RM-M and MC was responsible for editing the video, narration, and follow-up data.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.