Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Primary cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: OVHIPEC-2, a phase III randomized clinical trial
Free
  1. Simone Koole1,2,
  2. Ruby van Stein1,2,
  3. Karolina Sikorska3,
  4. Desmond Barton4,
  5. Lewis Perrin5,
  6. Donal Brennan6,
  7. Oliver Zivanovic7,
  8. Berit Jul Mosgaard8,
  9. Anna Fagotti9,
  10. Pierre-Emmanuel Colombo10,
  11. Gabe Sonke2 and
  12. W J van Driel1,11,12,13
  13. on behalf of the OVHIPEC-2 Steering Committee and the Dutch OVHIPEC group
    1. 1 Department of Gynaecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    2. 2 Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    3. 3 Department of Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
    4. 4 Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
    5. 5 Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer, Herston, Queensland, Australia
    6. 6 Gynaecology Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
    7. 7 Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
    8. 8 Department of Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
    9. 9 Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
    10. 10 Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    11. 11 Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Center for Gynaecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    12. 12 Dutch Gynecological Oncology Group (DGOG), the Netherlands, the Netherlands
    13. 13 Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (DPOG), the Netherlands, the Netherlands
    1. Correspondence to Dr W J van Driel, Department of Gynaecology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland 1066 CX, The Netherlands; w.v.driel{at}nki.nl

    Abstract

    Background The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery improves recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer who are ineligible for primary cytoreductive surgery. The effect of HIPEC remains undetermined in patients who are candidates for primary cytoreductive surgery.

    Primary objective The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of HIPEC on overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who are treated with primary cytoreductive surgery resulting in no residual disease, or residual disease up to 2.5 mm in maximum dimension.

    Study hypothesis We hypothesize that the addition of HIPEC to primary cytoreductive surgery improves overall survival in patients with primary FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Trial design This international, randomized, open-label, phase III trial will enroll 538 patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Following complete or near-complete (residual disease ≤2.5 mm) primary cytoreduction, patients are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive HIPEC or no HIPEC. All patients will receive six courses of platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy, and maintenance PARP-inhibitor or bevacizumab according to current guidelines.

    Major eligibility criteria Patients with FIGO stage III primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer are eligible after complete or near-complete primary cytoreductive surgery. Patients with resectable umbilical, spleen, or local bowel lesions may be included. Enlarged extra-abdominal lymph nodes should be negative on FDG-PET or fine-needle aspiration/biopsy.

    Primary endpoint The primary endpoint is overall survival.

    Sample size To detect a HR of 0.67 in favor of HIPEC, 200 overall survival events are required. With an expected accrual period of 60 months and 12 months additional follow-up, 538 patients need to be randomized.

    Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting results The OVHIPEC-2 trial started in January 2020 and primary analyses are anticipated in 2026.

    Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03772028

    • ovarian cancer
    • surgical oncology
    • peritoneal neoplasms
    • surgical procedures, operative

    Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Introduction

    Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality of all gynecologic cancers in the developed world.1 More than 75% of patients are diagnosed with advanced stage disease – disease that has spread beyond the ovaries to the peritoneal surfaces of the pelvis and abdomen. The 10-year survival of women with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III and IV) is 10%–15% and has not improved over the past 20 years.2 There is an unmet medical need for therapeutic strategies that prevent or delay disease recurrence and improve survival.

    The peritoneal surface is the primary site for ovarian cancer to recur, highlighting the need for therapeutic approaches that specifically target the peritoneal surface. Intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapy leads to higher intracellular concentrations compared with intravenous delivery and has a penetration depth up to 2.5 mm.3 4 Intraperitoneal chemotherapy thus effectively targets microscopic residual disease after macroscopically complete cytoreduction. Previous randomized clinical trials showed significant survival benefit with adjuvant normothermic intraperitoneal/intravenous chemotherapy cycles administered using a transabdominal catheter.5–8 8 Increased toxicity, logistic challenges, and catheter-related adverse events limited uptake in clinical practice. Moreover, results of the randomized GOG 252 study suggesting that intraperitoneal delivery is non-superior if bevacizumab is added, have contributed to its underuse.9

    Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a single procedure in which heated chemotherapy is administered into the peritoneal cavity at the end of the cytoreductive surgery. The elevated temperature enhances the penetration of chemotherapy, causes denaturation of intracellular proteins, and increases the sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy by transiently impairing DNA damage repair.10–12 In contrast to intraperitoneal administration using a catheter, HIPEC allows for equal distribution of chemotherapy through the peritoneal cavity without catheter- related complications.

    The randomized OVHIPEC study provides further evidence that adding HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery improves recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with stage III ovarian cancer, who are ineligible for primary cytoreductive surgery due to extensive intraperitoneal disease.13 A 5-year survival benefit of 10% was shown in patients who received HIPEC. For the majority of stage III ovarian cancer patients upfront cytoreductive surgery is feasible and the effect of HIPEC in these patients remains uncertain.

    We hypothesize that the addition of HIPEC to a complete or near-complete primary cytoreductive surgery improves overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer.

    Methods

    Trial design

    OVHIPEC-2 is an international, randomized, open-label, phase III trial that will enroll 538 patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Following complete or near-complete (residual disease ≤2.5 mm) primary cytoreduction, patients are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive HIPEC or no HIPEC. Randomization will take place in the operating room, after cytoreduction has been completed. All patients will receive six courses of platinum-paclitaxel based chemotherapy, and if indicated poly (ADP (ADP)-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition and bevacizumab according to current guidelines (Figure 1). Written informed consent will be collected before any study-related procedures take place. Central randomization will be performed intra-operatively using ALEA online software, after complete or near-complete cytoreduction is achieved.

    The trial is executed by the Dutch Gynaecological Oncology Group (DGOG) at 10 participating Dutch sites. Other selected hospitals with deputies in the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) and/or the European Network for Gynaecological Oncological Trial groups (ENGOT), and with documented experience in cytoreductive procedures and HIPEC procedures, may participate. The surgical team needs to perform at least 20 cytoreductive procedures for ovarian cancer per year and need to have prior experience of at least 10 HIPEC procedures for ovarian cancer before the start of accrual.

    Institutional review board approval for the trial has been obtained. The trial is funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (DCS), the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), and the Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program of the Dutch Ministry of Health.

    Procedure

    HIPEC will be performed using the open or closed technique. The abdomen is filled with saline, and the suspension is heated to 40°C–41°C, using a heat exchanger. With a flow rate of 1 liter per minute, perfusion with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 is started. The HIPEC procedure is estimated to take 120 min in total, including the 90-min perfusion period. To prevent nephrotoxicity, sodium thiosulphate will be administered intravenously at the start of perfusion and be continued up until 6 hours after the start of the infusion. The procedure was described previously.13 Patients in both study arms receive six cycles of adjuvant carboplatin-paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. In addition, PARP inhibition or bevacizumab will be administered according to current guidelines. Follow-up will be conducted every 3 months for the first 2 years of follow-up, and every 6 months in the following 3 years of the follow-up. CA125 will be measured during every follow-up visit, and computed tomography (CT) scans will be performed at end of treatment, and at 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up.

    Participants

    Patients with FIGO stage III primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer are eligible after they receive complete or near-complete primary cytoreductive surgery. Patients with resectable umbilical lesions, spleen involvement, or local bowel involvement may also be included. Enlarged extra-abdominal lymph nodes should have a negative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) traced positron-emission tomography (PET), or representative fine needle aspiration or biopsy. Pre-operative laparoscopy may be used to evaluate operability. Table 1 shows the full inclusion criteria.

    Table 1

    Inclusion criteria

    If successful primary cytoreductive surgery is not considered feasible, patients will be excluded. Specific criteria for non-resectability are listed in the full exclusion criteria in Table 2. A screening-log of all stage III and IV patients will be held in each participating hospital to monitor patient selection.

    Table 2

    Exclusion criteria

    Endpoints

    The primary endpoint of this study is overall survival. Overall survival is defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. For subjects who are alive, their survival time will be censored at the date of last contact. Overall survival will be censored for subjects at the date of randomization if they were randomized but had no follow-up. Survival status will be updated for long-term overall survival for life. Secondary endpoints are recurrence-free survival, time to start of the first subsequent anticancer treatment after the first recurrence, and the incidence and grade of toxicity and morbidity. The definition of recurrence-free survival is specified as the time from randomization to the first date of documented progression/recurrence, as determined by the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria in combination with clinical and/or radiological assessments, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.14 Time to start of the first subsequent anticancer treatment after the first recurrence is an intermediate endpoint between recurrence-free survival and overall survival, considering time between recurrence and start of the next treatment line. Standardization of the follow-up with regular CA125 measurements and CT-scans at specific time points will be strictly adhered to in order to prevent bias in the measurement of secondary endpoints from the open-label design of the study. Exploratory endpoints are the time to second subsequent anticancer treatment after progressive disease, health-related quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Pre-specified subgroup analyses will be performed based on the stratification factors (institute, peritoneal cancer index at start of surgery, and for completeness of surgery), histologic subtype, and BRCA mutation .

    Sample size

    Assuming a median overall survival after optimal or complete primary cytoreductive surgery in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer of 49.7 months, a two-sided experiment-wise α=0.05 log-rank test procedure requires 200 overall survival events to show a statistically significant difference in overall survival.5 This is calculated with set 80% power, when the true HR of the experimental arm to the control arm is similar to what was previously observed in patients after interval cytoreductive surgery (0.67).13 This sample size calculation accounts for two interim analyses after 67 and 133 events, with alpha spending function according to O’Brien–Fleming.15 Assuming that accrual will be completed in 60 months, and adding 12 months additional follow-up, 538 patients need to be randomized. In case of misspecification of the median survival for the control arm, the number of enrolled patients or minimum follow-up period may be changed during the course of the study to achieve the required number of events.

    Randomization

    Patients will be registered before surgery, and randomized during surgery after primary cytoreduction, when there is no more than 2.5 mm residual disease. If primary complete, or near-complete (≤2.5 mm) cytoreduction is not feasible, patients will be considered a screening failure, and will not be randomized. Randomization with equal probability of assignment to each treatment regimen will be performed centrally by the method of minimization with a random element, using online ALEA software. Randomization will be stratified for institute, for low (0–15), intermediate (16-30), or high (31-45) ovarian peritoneal cancer index at the start of surgery, and for the completeness of surgery: complete cytoreduction or residual disease up to 2.5 mm.

    Statistical methods

    The final analysis of the overall survival of patients in the trial will be conducted after 200 deaths have been observed. The outcome will be considered significant if the two-sided p-value is <0.045, to ensure overall type 1 error at 5%. The primary analysis will include tabulation of all cases entered, the distribution of important prognostic baseline variables, and observed results with respect to the primary and secondary endpoints. All randomized patients will be included in the analysis for overall survival according to the intention to treat principle. A sensitivity analysis will be carried out for the effect of HIPEC on overall survival excluding the patients who received adjuvant intraperitoneal/intravenous chemotherapy. The analysis of recurrence-free survival, and time to first subsequent anticancer treatment after first recurrent disease will be carried out similarly as the primary study parameter. The analysis of overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and time to first subsequent anticancer treatment after first recurrent disease will be based on Kaplan–Meier procedures, and the primary hypothesis will be evaluated by using the stratified log-rank test. To adjust for random differences in baseline covariates, we will also estimate the treatment effect by Cox’s proportional hazard regression model, given that the proportional hazards assumptions are valid. Two interim analyses for efficacy of the primary endpoint are planned after 67 and 133 events for overall survival at a one-sided nominal P-value of 0.003 and 0.0071, respectively.

    Recurrence-free survival as determined by the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup criteria, treatment-related toxicity and morbidity are secondary endpoints. Safety and tolerability will be measured by the incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, selected adverse events, and specific laboratory abnormalities (worst grade) in each treatment group. Adverse events and laboratory abnormalities will be graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and the Clavien–Dindo classification.16 An interim safety-run will be performed to evaluate the safety of HIPEC and adjuvant intraperitoneal/intravenous chemotherapy following 10 patients treated with HIPEC and intraperitoneal/intravenous adjuvant chemotherapy.

    Discussion

    The OVHIPEC trial showed that the addition of HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery is safe and improves recurrence-free survival and overall survival for patients with stage III ovarian cancer, who are ineligible for primary cytoreductive surgery due to the extent of disease.13 To determine if HIPEC has a similar effect when added to primary cytoreductive surgery, we initiated the randomized phase III OVHIPEC-2 trial. This trial randomizes patients who are treated with primary complete, or near-complete cytoreductive surgery to receive HIPEC or no HIPEC with the same treatment schedule that was administered in the OVHIPEC trial. The hyperthermia and the intraperitoneal chemotherapy may act synergistically, since the elevated temperature contributes to the penetration of chemotherapy and to the sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy. In in-vitro studies, the elevated temperature degrades BRCA2 and thereby inhibits homologous recombination, which in combination with double strand breaks caused by platinum-based chemotherapy, results in tumor cell death.10–12 17

    The OVHIPEC-2 trial design does not allow us to disentangle the effects of hyperthermia and intraperitoneal delivery of chemotherapy. However, hyperthermia does not add major toxicity and a multi-arm trial that also includes arms with intraperitoneal heated saline or normal temperature intraperitoneal chemotherapy requires thousands of patients.

    The current trial is designed as open-label trial, introducing potential open-label biases. Several measures are taken to limit these. Randomization takes place at the latest possible moment during surgery, after complete or almost complete (lesions up to 2.5 mm) resection is reached. Surgical bias will thereby be minimized. To also minimize open-label bias during follow-up, scheduled follow-up visits with CA125 measurements and CT scans will be strictly adhered to.

    To guarantee high surgical quality, requirements are in place for hospitals to participate in the trial: participating hospitals need to be involved in a national or regional trial group with a deputy in the Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup, or the European Network for Gynaecological Oncological Trial group, and should have experience in cytoreductive procedures combined with HIPEC procedures for ovarian cancer.

    Since HIPEC is a treatment strategy that is added to the primary surgical intervention, participation in the trial does not avert other adjuvant options. All patients in the trial are scheduled to receive six adjuvant cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Patients may also receive maintenance treatment with PARP inhibition after first-line chemotherapy, according to local protocols.18–20 The same approach applies to other upfront strategies, for example, adjuvant intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy, or maintenance bevacizumab. All first-line cancer treatment strategies and maintenance strategies that are administered during follow-up will be registered and closely monitored. The first line of treatment after the first recurrent disease will be registered.

    Since BRCA mutational status and the histology type is not always known before start of the primary cytoreductive surgery, patients cannot be stratified for these characteristics. Central histological review will be performed for all participants and will be registered and reported. Pre-specified subgroup analysis will be performed for high-grade serous ovarian cancer vs other histological types. If somatic and/or germline BRCA testing is performed, these results will be registered for all patients and subgroup analysis will also be performed for somatic and germline BRCA mutations.

    The OVHIPEC-2 trial will elucidate whether the addition of HIPEC to primary cytoreductive surgery improves overall and recurrence-free survival in patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. The results of this trial could potentially change practice for women with advanced stage ovarian cancer who still represent a patient population with a great unmet medical need.

    Acknowledgments

    D. Baars, M. Schrier, H. van Tinteren, A. Torres, V. Verwaal.

    References

    1. 1.
    2. 2.
    3. 3.
    4. 4.
    5. 5.
    6. 6.
    7. 7.
    8. 8.
    9. 9.
    10. 10.
    11. 11.
    12. 12.
    13. 13.
    14. 14.
    15. 16.
    16. 16.
    17. 17.
    18. 18.
    19. 19.
    20. 20.

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @hetAVL

    • Collaborators The International OVHIPEC-2 Steering Committee (in alphabetical order): N Bakrin, S Banerjee, S Barry, DP Barton, D Brennan, PE Colombo, M Deraco, WJ van Driel, A Fagotti, R Farrell, R Grisham, BJ Mosgaard, I McNeish, L Perrin, GS Sonke, O Zivanovic. The Dutch OVHIPEC group (in alphabetical order): HJG Arts, I Boere, GJ Creemers, WJ van Driel, KN Gaarenstroom, M van Gent, M van Ham, B Hellebrekers, R Hermans, I de Hingh, SN Koole, JR Kroep, CD de Kroon, R Lalisang, S Lambrechts, P Ottevanger, N Reesink, V Retel, AKL Reyners, EM Roes, HWR Schreuder, GS Sonke, RM van Stein, A Thijs, A Westermann, PO Witteveen, A Wymenga, R Yigit. Dutch Gynaecological Oncology Group (DGOG), Dutch Peritoneal Oncology Group (DPOG).

    • Contributors Conception and study design: WJvD, GS, SK, RvS, OVHIPEC-2 Steering Committee, Dutch OVHIPEC group. Statistical calculations: KS. Manuscript writing: SK, WJvD, GS. Manuscript editing and reviewing: RvS, KS, DB, LP, DB, OZ, BJM, AF, PE-C, GS, WJvD. Final approval of manuscript: SK, WJvD, GS.

    • Funding The trial is funded by the Dutch Cancer Society (DCS), the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), and the Coverage with Evidence Development (CED) program of the Dutch Ministry of Health.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient consent for publication Not required.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

    • Data availability statement Data will be available upon request

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.