Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A randomized phase III trial of platinum chemotherapy plus paclitaxel with bevacizumab and atezolizumab versus platinum chemotherapy plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab in metastatic (stage IVB), persistent, or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: the BEATcc study (ENGOT-Cx10/GEICO 68-C/JGOG1084/GOG-3030)
  1. Juan Francisco Grau,
  2. Lorena Farinas-Madrid and
  3. Ana Oaknin
  1. Vall d’Hebron University Hospital Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Professor Ana Oaknin, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona 08035, Spain; aoaknin{at}vhio.net

Abstract

Background Patients with metastatic, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer not amenable to local control and/or distant metastases have a very poor prognosis, only being candidates for palliative-systemic therapy. First line standard treatment in this scenario is based on cisplatin/paclitaxel plus bevacizumab (GOG 240 regimen) with a short median overall survival (16.8 months) and progression-free survival (8.2 months).

Primary objective To determine whether the addition of atezolizumab to cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab improves overall survival, compared with cisplatin-paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer.

Study hypothesis The primary hypothesis is whether the addition of atezolizumab to cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab improves overall survival in metastatic, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer.

Trial design The BEATcc study is a phase III, randomized, open-label, multi-center clinical trial. The study will be performed on an intent-to-treat population. The control arm is the administration of chemotherapy (platinum plus paclitaxel) and bevacizumab, while the experimental arm is the administration of atezolizumab in combination with the same chemotherapy regimen (1:1 randomization). The trial will be run under the ENGOT umbrella alongside JGOG and GOG-F. GEICO is the lead group on behalf of ENGOT.

Major Inclusion/Exclusion criteria Women over 18 years old with histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous metastatic, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer, not amenable for curative treatment with surgery and/or radiation therapy, will be included. Women are not eligible if they have received prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for metastatic or persistent/recurrent disease or they have disease involving the bladder or rectum at the screening/baseline pelvic magnetic resonance imaging.

Primary endpoint Overall survival, defined as the observed length of life from entry into the study (day of randomization) to death from any cause or the date of last contact.

Sample size A total of 404 patients are expected to be recruited into the study, assuming a total 10% drop-out rate. In order to test whether the experimental arm improves overall survival, the study will have 80% power using one-sided α of 0.025. There will be one interim analysis to close the study in case of early efficacy results in the experimental arm.

Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting results The trial was launched in Q3 2018 and the trial is estimated to close in Q3 2022. We expect to be able to report mature data from the BEATcc trial by 2023.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03556839)

  • cervical cancer
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors AO has contributed to the development of the study and the design of the trial. She has also contributed to the writing of the manuscript. FG and LF-M have contributed to the the writing of the manuscript.

  • Funding This study was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche.

  • Competing interests AO has served on advisory boards for Clovis Oncology, AstraZeneca, Genmab/Seattle Genetics, ImmunoGen, PharmaMar, Roche, and Tesaro and received support for travel or accommodation from AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, Roche, and Tesaro.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.