Article Text

Download PDFPDF
EP1233 Wide variation in self-management skills in gynaecological cancer survivors from the netherlands, denmark and norway – first results from the InCHARGE study
  1. BH de Rooij1,2,
  2. M Skorstad3,
  3. M Moustgaard Jeppesen4,5,
  4. S Holm Bergholdt6,7,
  5. NPM Ezendam1,2,
  6. PT Jensen6,7,
  7. I Vistad3 and
  8. LV van de Poll-Franse1,2,8
  1. 1Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht
  2. 2Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
  3. 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
  4. 4Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lillebaelt Hospital, Kolding
  5. 5OPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense
  6. 6Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital and Faculty of Health, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus
  7. 7Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  8. 8Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands


Introduction/Background With improved survivorship and limited resources for follow-up care, patients are expected to manage their disease well beyond active treatment. Little is known about the factors that empower patients to thrive after gynaecological cancer. In three Northern European countries, we aimed to 1) identify and characterize subgroups of gynaecological cancer survivors based on self-management skills, and 2) assess what socio-demographic and clinical factors are associated with these subgroups.

Methodology In the InCHARGE study (International Collaboration of Healthcare professionals And Researchers for Gynaecological cancer survivors’ Empowerment), patients with ovarian, endometrial and cervical cancers participated in a self-administered survey at 1–7 years after initial diagnosis. Questionnaires included sociodemographic and clinical variables, and assessed self-management in 7 domains. Subgroups with similar scores on self-management domains were identified and characterized using latent class cluster analysis, and factors associated with the subgroups were assessed using multiple logistic regression analysis.

Results Out of 1,387 participants, cluster analysis identified 4 subgroups of survivors: 1) high self-management on all domains (51%), 2) activity-focused self-management (19%), 3) relationship-focused self-management (15%), and 4) low self-management on all domains (16%) (Abstract EP1233 figure 1). Compared to cluster 1, survivors in cluster 2 more often had ovarian cancer, were more often younger and Danish and had more comorbidity; survivors in cluster 3 had lower cancer stages and less often underwent chemotherapy; and survivors in cluster 4 were more often cervical cancer patients with higher cancer stages, more often underwent chemotherapy or radiotherapy and were younger, lower-educated and had more comorbidity.

Conclusion The substantial variation in self-management skills among gynaecological cancer survivors suggests that subgroups of survivors need additional support for long-term management of their cancer. Younger and lower-educated cervical cancer patients with higher cancer stages may particularly require support with regard to skills and techniques to cope with their symptoms.

Disclosure Funding for this study was provided by the Norwegian Symptom Management Network (NORSMAN).

Abstract EP1233 Figure 1

Spider plot of self-management scores by self-management cluster

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.