You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Poster exhibition Day 1
P1234 Impact of hysterectomy after chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer
  1. L Ouldamer1,
  2. C Faussat2,
  3. S Bendifallah3,
  4. C Touboul4,
  5. P Collinet5,
  6. C Coutant6,
  7. C Akladios7,
  8. V Lavoué8,
  9. PA Bolze9,
  10. C Huchon10,
  11. A Bricou11,
  12. G Canlorbe12,
  13. E Raimond13,
  14. E Darai14,
  15. A Caille2,
  16. G Body15 and
  17. Francogyn Study Group
  1. 1CHU Tours | Gyn Oncology, CHU Bretonneau
  2. 2Université de Tours, Tours
  3. 3Hôpital de Tenon, Paris
  4. 4CHIC, Creteil
  5. 5Chu de Lille, Lille
  6. 6CAC Dijon, Dijon
  7. 7Chu de Strasbourg, Strasbourg
  8. 8CHU de Rennes, Rennes
  9. 9Chu de Lyon, Lyon
  10. 10Chu Poissy, Poissy
  11. 11Chu Jean Verdier, Bobigny
  12. 12La Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Paris
  13. 13Chu de Reims, Reims
  14. 14Gynecology, Tenon University Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris 6, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie (IUC), Paris
  15. 15Chu de Tours, Tours, France

Abstract

Introduction/Background Standard of care worldwide of locally advanced cancer tend to be non surgical (chemoradiation therapy) with no certainty if this attitude improves survival or not. Therefore, it is important to assess the value of hysterectomy in addition to chemoradiation therapy in this context.

The sole randomized controlled trial (Morice 2012) designed to answer a similar question was closed early due to poor accrual and included 61 women, reported no difference in overall and recurrence-free survival between chemoradiation therapy and hysterectomy versus chemoradiotherapy alone.

Methodology Data from 1,963 patients with cervical cancer were collected retrospectively from1 January 2000 to 31 December 2016, from the FRANCOGYN database, pooling data from 12 centres. Survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to define prognostic factors of survival. Patients included had IB2 to IIB FIGO stage.

Results 739 were included with a mean age of 53.5 years (±13.5). 634 women had available data of imaging after chemoradiotherapy. Management according to the presence of residue on imaging is presented on figure 1. 376 women had hysterectomy.

There were significant differences for the 5-year Overall Survival (OS) rates between women who underwent hysterectomy and women who did not (p<0.0001). Salvage hysterectomy was an independent negative predictive factor of OS (HR=0.27 (95%CI, 0.16–0.45), p<0.0001).

There were also significant differences for the 5-year Disease-Free Survival (DFS) rates between the two groups (p<0.0001). Salvage hysterectomy was an independent negative predictive factor of DFS (HR=0.45 (95%CI, 0.31–0.66), p<0.0001).

Conclusion A potential positive effect of hysterectomy after chemoradiation therapy for stage IB2 to IIB cervical cancer should be considered.

Disclosure Nothing to disclose.

Abstract P1234 Figure 1
Abstract P1234 Figure 1

Flow chart of management according to residue on post chemoradiation imaging

Abstract P1234 Figure 2
Abstract P1234 Figure 2

Survival according to surgery or not after chemoradiation therapy

https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2019-ESGO.161

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.