Article Text
Abstract
Objectives To compare survival measures of women with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent either hysteroscopy or a non-hysteroscopic procedure as a diagnostic procedure.
Methods An Israel Gynecologic Oncology Group multicenter study of 1324 patients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups: hysteroscopy and non-hysteroscopy (curettage or office endometrial biopsy). Clinical, pathological, and survival measures were compared between the groups.
Results There were 355 patients in the hysteroscopy group and 969 patients in the non-hysteroscopy group. The median follow-up was 52 months (range 12–120 months). There were no differences between the groups in the 5-year recurrence-free survival (90.2% vs. 88.2%; p=0.53), disease-specific survival (93.4% vs. 91.7%; p=0.5), and overall survival (86.2% vs. 80.6%; p=0.22).
Conclusions Our findings affirm that hysteroscopy does not compromise the survival of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.