Article Text

Download PDFPDF

248 Challenges and opportunities in the integration of pathology consultation into the IGCS project echo global telementoring program
  1. A Plotkin1,
  2. T Randall2,
  3. L Chuang3,
  4. J Ng4,
  5. M Eiken5,
  6. S O’Connor6,
  7. E Baker7,
  8. T Dinh8,
  9. J Rabban9,
  10. R Nout10 and
  11. K Schmeler11
  1. 1University of Toronto, Pathology, Toronto, Canada
  2. 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Gynecologic Oncology, Boston, USA
  3. 3Western Connecticut Health Network, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danbury, USA
  4. 4National University Cancer Institute, Gynecologic Oncology, Singapore, Singapore
  5. 5International Gynecologic Cancer Society, Igcs, Chicago, USA
  6. 6University of North Carolina, Pathology, Chapel Hill, USA
  7. 7MD Anderson Cancer Center, Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Houston, USA
  8. 8Mayo Clinic, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jacksonville, USA
  9. 9University of California- San Francisco, Pathology, San Francisco, USA
  10. 10University of Leiden Medical Center, Radiation Oncology, Leiden, The Netherlands
  11. 11MD Anderson Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology, Houston, USA


Objectives The Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) is a proven model to improve specialty care for underserved communities. The IGCS uses the Project ECHO platform to connect multi-disciplinary teams across disparate regions, through virtual tumor board case discussions and didactic presentations. In the Project ECHO sessions, international pathologists provide pathology review, which is often based on limited imaging embedded in Power Point slide presentations. We present an initial review of our experience integrating pathologists into the IGCS virtual tumor boards.

Methods We solicited feedback from pathologists and clinicians participating in the IGCS ECHO sessions in individual and small group settings.

Results Clinicians appreciate the inclusion of pathology images and teaching in ECHO sessions with good clinical and educational value. However, challenges were noted with engagement and scheduling with in-country pathologists. Challenges noted by the consulting pathologists included: being asked to offer an opinion with limited information or images, poor quality images, lack of the final pathology report, coping with apparent diagnostic errors, lacking an established relationship with the local pathologist, and the local pathologist not always being present to discuss or explain findings. Opportunities identified include: establishing telepathology connections to facilitate case review, leveraging the IGCS Global Curriculum international mentor/local mentor/trainee model to create parallel and synergistic international and local pathologist collaborative relationships beyond ECHO sessions, further program strengthening through international exchange trips for international and local pathologists.

Conclusions Inclusion of pathology experts in Project ECHO sessions is key to successful tumor boards. Addressing the above-noted challenges will strengthen the entire collaboration.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.