Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Patterns of Care for Stage IA Cervical Cancer: Use of Definitive Radiation Therapy Versus Hysterectomy
  1. Jeffrey M. Ryckman, MD*,
  2. Chi Lin, MD, PhD*,
  3. Charles B. Simone, MD and
  4. Vivek Verma, MD*
  1. * Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE; and
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jeffrey M. Ryckman, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, 986861 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198. E-mail: jeff.ryckman{at}unmc.edu.

Abstract

Objective The standard of care for clinical IA cervical cancer is surgery, but nonoperative cases may receive definitive radiation therapy (RT). Herein, we investigated national practice patterns associated with the administration of definitive RT as compared with hysterectomy-based surgery (HYS) as well as delivery of adjuvant RT after HYS.

Methods/Materials The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for clinical IA primary cervical cancer cases (2004–2013) receiving definitive RT or HYS with or without adjuvant RT. Patients with unknown RT or surgery status were excluded, as were benign histologies and receipt of non-HYS such as fertility-sparing surgery. Patient, tumor, and treatment parameters were extracted. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression determined variables associated with receipt of RT and HYS.

Results In total, 3816 patients were analyzed (n = 3514 [92.1%] HYS alone, n = 100 [2.6%] RT alone, n = 202 [5.3%] combination). On multivariable analysis of HYS versus definitive RT, RT was more likely to be given to patients who were older (P < 0.001) and with Medicare (P = 0.011), Medicaid/other government insurance (P = 0.011), or uninsured/unknown status (P = 0.003). In addition, treatment with surgery alone was associated with patients in the 2 highest income quartiles (P = 0.013, P = 0.054). On multivariable analysis of patients receiving RT in addition to HYS, adjuvant RT was added most commonly for positive margins (P < 0.001) and increasing age (P < 0.001).

Conclusions This is the largest analysis to date evaluating definitive RT for IA cervical cancer. Younger age and higher socioeconomic status are associated with receipt of HYS instead of definitive RT, and positive margins are most associated with the addition of adjuvant RT. Although these data must be further validated with better defined patient selection and do not imply causation, several socioeconomic findings discovered herein need to be addressed to ensure the highest quality cancer care to all patients.

  • Cervical cancer
  • Stage IA
  • Radiation therapy
  • Surgery
  • Patterns of care

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.