Article Text

Download PDFPDF
European Surgical Education and Training in Gynecologic Oncology: The impact of an Accredited Fellowship
  1. Luis M. Chiva, MD, PhD*,
  2. Jose Mínguez, MD, PhD*,
  3. Denis Querleu, MD, PhD,
  4. David Cibula, MD, PhD and
  5. Andreas du Bois, MD, PhD§
  1. * Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain;
  2. University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France;
  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; and
  4. § Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Luis M. Chiva, MD, PhD, Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Monoceros 22, Madrid 28023, Spain. E-mail: lchiva{at}


Objective The aim of this study was to understand the current situation of surgical education and training in Europe among members of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) and its impact on the daily surgical practice of those that have completed an accredited fellowship in gynecologic oncology.

Methods A questionnaire addressing topics of interest in surgical training was designed and sent to ESGO members with surgical experience in gynecologic oncology. The survey was completely confidentially and could be completed in less than 5 minutes. Responses from 349 members from 42 European countries were obtained, which was 38% of the potential target population. The respondents were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they had undergone an official accreditation process.

Results Two thirds of respondents said they had received a good surgical education. However, accredited gynecologists felt that global surgical training was significantly better. Surgical self-confidence among accredited specialists was significantly higher regarding most surgical oncological procedures than it was among their peers without such accreditation. However, the rate of self-assurance in ultraradical operations, and bowel and urinary reconstruction was quite low in both groups. There was a general request for standardizing surgical education across the ESGO area. Respondents demanded further training in laparoscopy, ultraradical procedures, bowel and urinary reconstruction, and postoperative management of complications. Furthermore, they requested the creation of fellowship programs in places where they are not now accredited and the promotion of rotations and exchange in centers of excellence. Finally, respondents want supporting training in disadvantaged countries of the ESGO area.

Conclusions Specialists in gynecologic oncology that have obtained a formal accreditation received a significantly better surgical education than those that have not. The ESGO responders recognize that their society should lead the standardization of surgical training and promote ways of improving members’ surgical skills.

  • ESGO
  • Surgical training
  • Fellowship
  • Standardization
  • Accreditation

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.