Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Hysterectomy for Uterine Cancer in the Elderly: A Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Techniques
  1. Andrew Zakhari, MD*,
  2. Nicholas Czuzoj-Shulman, BSc,
  3. Andrea R. Spence, PhD,
  4. Walter H. Gotlieb, MD, PhD*,, and
  5. Haim A. Abenhaim, MD, MPH*,
  1. *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
  2. Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and
  3. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Segal Cancer Center, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Haim A. Abenhaim, MD, MPH, FRCSC, Jewish General Hospital, Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGill University Pav H, Room 325 5790 Cote-Des-Neiges Road, Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1Y9. E-mail: haim.abenhaim@gmail.com.

Abstract

Objective The mainstay of treatment for uterine corpus cancer is surgical, and the gold standard approach has become minimally invasive surgery. The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative complications and demographics of patients 80 years old or more undergoing robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine cancer.

Materials and Methods Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we retrospectively identified all women aged 80 years or older who had hysterectomies for uterine cancer by either modality. The complication rates of surgery in both groups were adjusted for potential confounding and compared using logistic regression analyses.

Results There were 915 women aged 80 years or older identified with uterine corpus cancer who had either laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Robotically treated patients were more likely to be obese (8.8% vs 3.5%) but were otherwise similar in terms of mean age, comorbidities, income, ethnicity, and insurance status. Those undergoing robotic surgery were less likely to have admissions beyond 3 days (29.0% vs 38.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; P < 0.01) and had a lower composite incidence of any complication (24.3% vs 31.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.7; P < 0.05). When looking at those who had lymph node dissections, there was a lower rate of postoperative ileus, and a trend toward fewer venous thromboembolic events.

Conclusions Among octogenarians and nonagenarians with uterine corpus cancer, robotic surgery is associated with a shorter hospital admission and a better complication profile than laparoscopy.

  • Robotic surgery
  • Laparoscopy
  • Uterine cancer
  • Elderly

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • The authors report no declarations of interest.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.