Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Alteration of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 Genetic and Epigenetic Profiles in Cervical Cancer Patients Is Indicative of Poor Disease Prognosis: A Cohort Analysis
  1. Sankhadeep Dutta, PhD,
  2. Ratnesh Kumar Singh, PhD,
  3. Ranajit Kumar Mandal, PhD,
  4. Susanta Roychoudhury, PhD,
  5. Partha Basu, MD and
  6. Chinmay Kumar Panda, PhD
  1. * Departments of Oncogene Regulation and
  2. Gynecological Oncology, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute; and
  3. Cancer Biology and Inflammatory Disorder Division, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Kolkata, India.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Chinmay Kumar Panda, PhD, Department of Oncogene Regulation, Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute, 37, SP Mukherjee Rd, Kolkata, India. E-mail: chinmaykumar.panda{at}cnci.org.in; ckpanda.cnci{at}gmail.com.

Abstract

Objective Aim of this study was to assess the changes in genetic and epigenetic profiles of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16), if any, in primary cervical cancer (CaCx) and corresponding plasma before and after therapy for possible prognostic evaluation.

Methods The genetic (integration status) and epigenetic (methylation of enhancer, early promoter, and late promoter sequences) profiles of HPV16 were analyzed in pretherapy CaCx (n = 46), corresponding plasma, posttherapy cervical swabs (n = 39), and corresponding plasma from a single patient cohort. Quantitative viral load was also measured in these HPV16-positive primary CaCx and posttherapy cervical swabs.

Results Presence of HPV16 in the patients’ plasma before/after therapy was significantly (P = 0.03) associated with higher viral load in the primary tumor site. Human papillomavirus type 16 integration and hypomethylation of the early (14 of 29, Z = 4.47, P < 0.01) and late promoters (20 of 29, Z = 3.74, P < 0.01) were more prevalent in the plasma than the corresponding pretherapy CaCx samples. However, the dissimilarity in integration status (5 of 24) was less evident between posttherapy cervical swabs and corresponding plasma, although hypomethylation of the early promoter and hypermethylation of the late promoter (8 of 24, Z = 2.6, P < 0.01) was seen in posttherapy plasma samples. Whereas in the posttherapy swabs, integrated (22 of 29) or mixed (7 of 29) form of HPV16 prevailed with hypomethylation of the enhancer (6 of 29, Z = 2.0, P < 0.05) and late promoter (18 of 29, Z = 4.4, P < 0.01) compared with the corresponding primary tumors. The patients having high HPV16 copy number in pretherapy and posttherapy cervical lesions and hypomethylation of early promoter/late promoter in the corresponding plasma showed increased disease recurrence with distant metastases.

Conclusions The genetic-epigenetic profile of HPV16 in pretherapy/posttherapy CaCx samples showed significant association with disease prognosis.

  • Uterine cervical carcinoma
  • Human papillomavirus type 16
  • HPV16 integration status
  • HPV16 promoter/enhancer methylation
  • Circulating tumor cells
  • Recurrence

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.