Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Vaginal Vault Brachytherapy With or Without Pelvic Radiotherapy for Stage 1 Papillary Serous or Clear Cell Endometrial Cancer
  1. Audrey Tétreault-Laflamme, MD*,
  2. Thu Van Nguyen-Huynh, MD,
  3. Jean-François Carrier, PhD*,
  4. Vanessa Samouëlian, MD, PhD,
  5. Philippe Sauthier, MD,
  6. Marie-Claude Beauchemin, MD* and
  7. Maroie Barkati, MD*
  1. *Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal;
  2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux Champlain–Charles Le Moyne, Longueuil; and
  3. Department of Gynecology Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Maroie Barkati, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 1560 Sherbrooke Est, Montréal, QC H2L 4 M1, Canada. E-mail: maroie.barkati.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to assess and compare adjuvant chemotherapy followed by either high–dose-rate vaginal vault brachytherapy (VBT) alone or combined with pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage 1 serous or clear cell (CC) endometrial cancer.

Methods Between 2006 and 2012, 84 women with stage 1 serous or CC endometrial cancer were evaluated postoperatively for adjuvant treatment at our hospital. More than 80% of patients had pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients declining or not completing adjuvant treatments were excluded. Twenty-five women received 4 to 6 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by EBRT and VBT. Thirty-two women received 6 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by VBT. Locoregional control and toxicities were assessed during follow-up.

Results The 3-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates for the VBT group compared with the EBRT + VBT group were 88% versus 84%, P = 0.6, and 100% versus 94%, P = 0.6, respectively. Only 1 patient in the EBRT + VBT group developed a distant recurrence. One patient had grade 3 toxicity (chronic gastrointestinal [GI] toxicity) in the EBRT + VBT group. Acute grade 1-to-2 GI and grade 1 genitourinary (GU) toxicities were less frequent in the VBT group compared with the EBRT + VBT group (P = 0.008 and P = 0.019, respectively). Late GI and GU toxicities were comparable. Grade 1 vaginal toxicity was similar in both groups. No acute or late grade 2 GU or vaginal toxicities were reported.

Conclusions According to this study, VBT alone seems to be as effective as EBRT and VBT for stage 1 serous and CC endometrial cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Furthermore, less acute GI and GU toxicities were seen in the VBT group.

  • Brachytherapy
  • External beam radiotherapy
  • Stage I endometrial cancer
  • Type II endometrial cancer

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.