Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Universal Surgical Risk Calculator for a Gynecologic Oncology Service
  1. J. Brian Szender, MD*,
  2. Peter J. Frederick, MD*,
  3. Kevin H. Eng, PhD,
  4. Stacey N. Akers, MD*,
  5. Shashikant B. Lele, MD* and
  6. Kunle Odunsi, PhD, MD*
  1. *Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, and
  2. Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to J. Brian Szender, MD, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm St and Carlton St, Buffalo, NY 14263. E-mail: James.Szender@RoswellPark.org.

Abstract

Objectives The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program is aimed at preventing perioperative complications. An online calculator was recently published, but the primary studies used limited gynecologic surgery data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Universal Surgical Risk Calculator (URC) on the patients of a gynecologic oncology service.

Study Design We reviewed 628 consecutive surgeries performed by our gynecologic oncology service between July 2012 and June 2013. Demographic data including diagnosis and cancer stage, if applicable, were collected. Charts were reviewed to determine complication rates. Specific complications were as follows: death, pneumonia, cardiac complications, surgical site infection (SSI) or urinary tract infection, renal failure, or venous thromboembolic event. Data were compared with modeled outcomes using Brier scores and receiver operating characteristic curves. Significance was declared based on P < 0.05.

Results The model accurately predicated death and venous thromboembolic event, with Brier scores of 0.004 and 0.003, respectively. Predicted risk was 50% greater than experienced for urinary tract infection; the experienced SSI and pneumonia rates were 43% and 36% greater than predicted. For any complication, the Brier score 0.023 indicates poor performance of the model.

Conclusions In this study of gynecologic surgeries, we could not verify the predictive value of the URC for cardiac complications, SSI, and pneumonia. One disadvantage of applying a URC to multiple subspecialties is that with some categories, complications are not accurately estimated. Our data demonstrate that some predicted risks reported by the calculator need to be interpreted with reservation.

  • Postoperative complications
  • Risk assessment
  • Outcomes research
  • Gynecologic surgery
  • Perioperative care

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Supported by Roswell Park Cancer Institute grants NCI P30CA016056 and NIH 5T32CA108456

  • Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citation appears in the printed text and is provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.ijgc.net).

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.