Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Robotic Extraperitoneal Paraaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Cancers: Feasibility, Safety, and Short-Term Outcomes of Isolated and Combined Procedures
  1. Anne-Sophie Bats, PhD*,,,
  2. Myriam Mimouni, MD,
  3. Chérazade Bensaïd, MD,
  4. Julien Seror, MD*,,
  5. Nathalie Douay-Hauser, MD*,,
  6. Claude Nos, MD and
  7. Fabrice Lécuru, PhD*,,
  1. *Faculté de Médecine, Université Paris Descartes;
  2. Service de Chirurgie Cancérologique Gynécologique et du Sein, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou; and
  3. INSERM UMR-S 747, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Anne-Sophie Bats, MD, PhD, Service de Chirurgie Cancérologique Gynécologique et du Sein, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France. E-mail: anne-sophie.bats{at}egp.aphp.fr.

Abstract

Objective The aim of our study was to report the technique, the feasibility, and perioperative results of robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers performed for isolated or combined procedures.

Methods This is a retrospective study of 24 consecutive patients undergoing robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy using the Da Vinci Surgical system (Intuitive Inc, Sunnyvale, CA) (cervical cancer, n = 15; high-risk endometrial cancer, n = 8; and ovarian cancer, n = 2, including 1 synchronous tumor). Extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy was performed using the surgical technique previously described by laparoscopy.

Results Of the 24 included patients, 12 patients had isolated robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy, whereas the others underwent the following associated procedures: total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and omentectomy (n = 7); pelvic transperitoneal lymphadenectomy (n = 3), laparotomic Bricker procedure (n = 1), and colpectomy (n = 1). The median age of patients was 55 (42–64) years, and body mass index was 24.1 kg/m2 (20.9–26.1). The operation was completed in all patients except three with associated procedures. Perioperative difficulties were encountered in 9 patients (gas leakage, n = 7; adhesions, n = 2; and dissection difficulties, n = 1). The number of removed paraaortic lymph nodes was 18 (14–25). The operating times were 180 (150–210) minutes for isolated extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy and 240 (180–300) minutes in case of associated procedures. There were 2 intraoperative (pneumothorax and renal artery injury) and 5 postoperative (3 grades 1–2 and 2 grade 3) complications.

Conclusions If robotic-assisted extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy seems feasible in case of isolated procedure, further studies are required to prove its benefit compared with conventional laparoscopy.

  • Robotic surgery
  • Paraaortic lymphadenectomy
  • Extraperitoneal route
  • Gynecological oncology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.