You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 24, Issue 3
  • Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complication Rates Between Conventional Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in the Evaluation and Management of Early, Advanced, and Recurrent Stage Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Citation Tools

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Surgeons Corner
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complication Rates Between Conventional Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in the Evaluation and Management of Early, Advanced, and Recurrent Stage Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:
Nezhat FR, Finger TN, Vetere P, et al
Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complication Rates Between Conventional Versus Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in the Evaluation and Management of Early, Advanced, and Recurrent Stage Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2014;24:600-607.