Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Prognostic Impact of the Cancer Stem Cell–Related Marker NANOG in Ovarian Serous Carcinoma
  1. Maria Lee, MD*,
  2. Eun Ji Nam, MD, PhD,
  3. Sang Wun Kim, MD, PhD,
  4. Sunghoon Kim, MD, PhD,
  5. Jae Hoon Kim, MD, PhD and
  6. Young Tae Kim, MD, PhD
  1. *Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University; and
  2. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women’s Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Young Tae Kim, MD, PhD, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Institute of Women’s Life Medical Science, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea. E-mail: ytkchoi@yuhs.ac.

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of NANOG expression in ovarian serous carcinoma.

Methods The expression of NANOG was evaluated in 6 ovarian carcinoma cell lines, paclitaxel-resistant SKOV3 cells, and SKOV3 spheroid cells with semiquantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. NANOG expression was also measured immunohistochemically in a tissue microarray containing ovarian tissues from 74 patients with ovarian serous carcinoma and 24 with ovarian serous cystadenoma. Each sample was scored based on signal intensity and proportion, and a score greater than 4 was considered “positive.”

Results NANOG mRNA expression was variable in different ovarian cancer cell lines. The mRNA level of NANOG was increased in the paclitaxel-resistant SKOV3 cells and SKOV3 spheroid cells compared with that in the SKOV3 cells. NANOG expression was positive in 21.6% of 74 ovarian serous carcinoma tissues, but none of the ovarian serous cystadenoma tissues were positive. Positive NANOG expression was associated with residual tumor size after surgery (P = 0.032). The overall survival of the patients with positive NANOG expression was poorer than that of the patients with negative NANOG expression (P = 0.020). In patients with stage I and II disease, positive NANOG expression was independently associated with shorter overall survival compared with negative NANOG expression (40 vs 120 months, respectively; P = 0.031).

Conclusions Positive NANOG expression is associated with poor prognosis of ovarian serous carcinoma. NANOG has potential as a predictor of survival for patients with ovarian carcinomas and may be involved in the mechanism of chemoresistance.

  • NANOG
  • Cancer stem cell
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Chemoresistance
  • Prognosis

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by the Brain Korea 21 project for Medical Sciences of Yonsei University and a grant of the Korea Healthcare technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea (A084120).

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.