Comparison of the Prognoses of FIGO Stage I to Stage II Adenosquamous Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Treated With Radical Hysterectomy

Seiji Mabuchi; Mika Okazawa; Yasuto Kinose; Koji Matsuo; Masateru Fujiwara; Osamu Suzuki; Eiichi Morii; Shoji Kamiura; Kazuhiko Ogawa; Tadashi Kimura

doi:10.1097/IGC.0b013e31826b5d9b

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About

YouTube

Podcasts

Zoom Journal Club

Visual Abstract Archive
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

Cervical Cancer

Comparison of the Prognoses of FIGO Stage I to Stage II Adenosquamous Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Treated With Radical Hysterectomy

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Mabuchi S, Okazawa M, Kinose Y, et al

Comparison of the Prognoses of FIGO Stage I to Stage II Adenosquamous Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Treated With Radical Hysterectomy

International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2012;22:1389-1397.

Log in using your username and password

Main menu

Log in using your username and password

You are here

Download to a citation manager

Read the full text or download the PDF:

Log in using your username and password