You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 22, Issue 1
  • The Quality of Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy Implantation and the Impact on Local Recurrence and Disease-Free Survival in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Prospective Trials 0116 and 0128

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Cervical Cancer
The Quality of Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy Implantation and the Impact on Local Recurrence and Disease-Free Survival in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Prospective Trials 0116 and 0128
  1. Akila N. Viswanathan, MD, MPH*,
  2. Jennifer Moughan, MSc†,
  3. William Small, MD‡,
  4. Charles Levenback, MD§,
  5. Revathy Iyer, MD§,
  6. Sharon Hymes, MD§,
  7. Adam P. Dicker, MD, PhD∥,
  8. Brigitte Miller, MD,
  9. Beth Erickson, MD# and
  10. David K. Gaffney, MD, PhD**
  1. * Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA;
  2. † Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Statistical Center, American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA;
  3. ‡ The Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL;
  4. § MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
  5. ∥ Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia,PA;
  6. Batte Cancer Center, Concord, NC;
  7. # Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; and
  8. ** Huntsman Cancer Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Akila N. Viswanathan, MD, MPH, Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital 75 Francis St, L2, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: aviswanathan{at}lroc.harvard.edu.

Abstract

Purpose The objective of the study was to determine the impact of brachytherapy implant quality on outcome among cervical cancer patients treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group prospective trials 0116 and 0128.

Methods All enrolled patients received concurrent chemoradiation followed by brachytherapy. Individual brachytherapy parameters, including the symmetry of ovoids in relation to the tandem, displacement of ovoids in relation to the cervical os, tandem bisecting the ovoids, tandem in the midpelvis, and appropriateness of packing, were scored for each implant. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed for each parameter for local recurrence (LR), regional recurrence, distant recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival.

Results Records for 103 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 24.5 months. Patients with unacceptable symmetry of ovoids to the tandem had a significantly higher risk of LR than patients in the acceptable group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–6.45; P = 0.03). Patients with displacement of ovoids in relation to the cervical os had a significantly increased risk of LR (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.05–5.93; P = 0.04) and a lower DFS rate (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.18–4.41; P = 0.01). Inappropriate placement of packing resulted in a lower DFS rate (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.08–3.92; P = 0.03).

Conclusions Assessment of the quality of a brachytherapy implant is imperative, as proper placement has an impact on patient DFS. If feasible, inappropriate placements should be corrected before treatment initiation. Brachytherapy applicators for cervical cancer should preferably be placed and assessed by experienced practitioners.

  • Brachytherapy quality
  • Cervical cancer

https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e31823ae3c9

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Footnotes

    • The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.