You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 21, Issue 4
  • Prognosis and Reproducibility of New and Existing Binary Grading Systems for Endometrial Carcinoma Compared to FIGO Grading in Hysterectomy Specimens

Article info

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Uterine Cancer
Prognosis and Reproducibility of New and Existing Binary Grading Systems for Endometrial Carcinoma Compared to FIGO Grading in Hysterectomy Specimens

Authors

  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Rouba Ali-Fehmi, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201. E-mail: rali{at}med.wayne.edu.

Citation

Guan H, Semaan A, Bandyopadhyay S, et al
Prognosis and Reproducibility of New and Existing Binary Grading Systems for Endometrial Carcinoma Compared to FIGO Grading in Hysterectomy Specimens
International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2011;21:654-660.

Publication history

  • Received January 17, 2011
  • First published April 1, 2011.
Online issue publication 
June 17, 2019

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

Copyright © 2011 by IGCS and ESGO