Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Salvage chemotherapy with a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin for the patients with recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix
  1. C. H. Choi*,
  2. T.-J. Kim*,
  3. S.-J. Lee,
  4. J.-W. Lee*,
  5. B.-G. Kim*,
  6. J.-H. Lee* and
  7. D.-S. Bae*
  1. * Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University Hospital, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Prof. Byoung-Gie Kim, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-Dong, Kangnam-Ku, Seoul 135-710, Korea. Email: bgkim{at}smc.samsung.co.kr

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicities of a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) for recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Fifty-three patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma were treated with ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 h on days 1–3, paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 as a 3-h intravenous infusion, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 intravenously over 30 min on day 1. The chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks until there was disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Forty-five patients received at least three courses of treatment and were evaluable for their response. Twenty-one patients (46.7%) showed objective responses, including 4.4% complete responses and 42.2% partial responses. The median time to progression and the overall survival for all the patients were 8.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1–8.9 months) and 19.0 months (95% CI, 11.9–26.1 months), respectively. The median duration of response was 9.0 months. Patients who had previously been treated with another chemotherapy after tumor recurrence showed a moderate response rate (29.4%) but a shorter time to progression (6 vs 8 months, P = 0.0421) and a shorter survival (11 vs 39 months, P = 0.0018). Patients with good performance status showed a higher response rate (63.6% vs 30.4%, P = 0.026) and a longer time to progression (9 vs 7 months, P = 0.0049). Patients with recurrent disease only outside the previous radiotherapy (RT) field exhibited a slightly higher response without statistical significance (60.0% vs 36.0%, P = 0.109). Grade 3 or 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 13% of patients and neurotoxicity in 5%. Three deaths during treatment were observed, but two of them were due to disease progression. We conclude that the combination chemotherapy with TIP yields a high response rate with acceptable toxicity for patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma, including those patients who have failed to respond to prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

  • chemotherapy
  • recurrent cervical carcinoma
  • survival
  • TIP (paclitaxel
  • ifosfamide
  • cisplatin)
  • toxicity

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.