CONTROVERSIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA: CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT VS. SIMPLE HYSTERECTOMY | International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

Authors

About

YouTube

Podcasts

Zoom Journal Club
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals

Citation Tools

Session 1 – Screening, Prevention, and Early Disease

CONTROVERSIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA: CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT VS. SIMPLE HYSTERECTOMY

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Curtin JP

CONTROVERSIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ATYPICAL HYPERPLASIA: CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT VS. SIMPLE HYSTERECTOMY

International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer 2005;15:401.