Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Impact of lymphadenectomy and intra-operative tumor rupture on survival in early-stage mucinous ovarian cancers
  1. Soyoun Rachel Kim1,2,
  2. Ainhoa Madariaga3,
  3. Liat Hogen1,2,
  4. Danielle Vicus2,4,
  5. Allan Covens2,4,
  6. Carlos Parra-Herran5,
  7. Stephanie Lheureux3 and
  8. Lilian T Gien2,4
  1. 1Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network/Sinai Health Systems, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  2. 2Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  3. 3Medical Oncology & Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre/University Health Networks/Sinai Health Systems, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  4. 4Gynecologic Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. 5Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lilian T Gien, Gynecologic Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada; Lilian.Gien{at}sunnybrook.ca

Abstract

Objective Mucinous ovarian carcinoma is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer with scarce literature guiding its management. We aimed to investigate the optimal surgical management of clinical stage I mucinous ovarian carcinoma by examining the prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy and intra-operative rupture on patient survival.

Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all pathology-reviewed invasive mucinous ovarian carcinomas diagnosed between 1999 and 2019 at two tertiary care cancer centers. Baseline demographics, surgical management details, and outcomes were collected. Five-year overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and the association of lymphadenectomy and intra-operative rupture on survival were examined.

Results Of 170 women with mucinous ovarian carcinoma, 149 (88%) had clinical stage I disease. Forty-eight (32%; n=149) patients had a pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy, but only 1 patient with grade 2 disease was upstaged due to positive pelvic lymph nodes. Intra-operative tumor rupture was documented in 52 cases (35%). On multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, final stage, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy, there was no significant association between intra-operative rupture with overall survival (HR 2.2 (0.6–8.0); p=0.3) or recurrence-free survival (HR 1.3 (0.5–3.3); p=0.6), or lymphadenectomy with overall survival (HR 0.9 (0.3–2.8); p=0.9) or recurrence-free survival (HR 1.2 (0.5–3.0); p=0.7). Advanced stage was the only factor that was significantly associated with survival.

Conclusions In clinical stage I mucinous ovarian carcinoma, systematic lymphadenectomy has low utility, as very few patients are upstaged and recurrence typically occurs in the peritoneum. Furthermore, intra-operative rupture does not appear to independently confer a worse survival, and therefore these women may not benefit from adjuvant treatment based on rupture alone.

  • Cystadenocarcinoma, Mucinous
  • Lymph Nodes

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Twitter @AinhoaMada, @stephanielheur5

  • Contributors SRK: data curation, formal analysis, project administration, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. AM: data curation, investigation, methodology, writing—review and editing. LH: conceptualization, investigation, writing—review and editing. DV: investigation, writing—review and editing. AC: investigation, writing—review and editing. CP-H: data curation, investigation, writing—review and editing. SL: conceptualization, investigation, writing—review and editing. LTG: guarantor, conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, project administration, investigation, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.